archla.blogg.se

Teradici pcoip vs view
Teradici pcoip vs view











Any CODEC will work, any player will work and any client can be used. The drawbacks are limited player support, more management on the client and limited media are support. The benifit is it requires less resources from the host since the client is used. It also requires the player supports the media type. MMR requires the client support the capability, has CODECS on the client. think about it like your weather man standing in front of a green screen.

teradici pcoip vs view

The content or graphics commands are sent from the host to the client and the client does the rendering and dispaly of the content. MMR or client side rendering renders native content on the client side. Historically this has been a problem for server based computing solutions. With host side rendering you have to have a REALLY good encoder to handle all the video and get it across a network as efficiently as possible. On a PC, when you play this type of content you will notice the CPU either spikes or runs at a high utilization during the playback as is working to decode and dispaly the video. are the most demanding components and challenging to render and deliver across a network.

teradici pcoip vs view

Arguably mulitmedia, Flash, WMV, H.264, MPEG etc. Host side rendering and client side rendering. There are two ways to render components of a desktop composition.













Teradici pcoip vs view